not often that I am rails against atheists (or say anything at all, these days), but this time I can not remain silent before such blindness, laziness and lack of acumen of these people even boasts exclusivity of the term "rational" to be defined.
I had already had the opportunity to make contacts with people in the galaxy bazzicanti Italian atheism, and what I saw I liked. People who use it, for its crusades, the same means of the enemy believer. Vehicles that can not possibly compete with the much larger operational capabilities of the church. If you make the proselytizing, you already know that the church can do so 10 times more effective. Do not try proving your intellectual superiority of knowing how to lower populism.
"The bad news is that God does not exist. The good news is that you do not need. " Blue background with white clouds, the "signature" of the EU clearly indicated: two buses of AMT, for the entire month of February, beginning Wednesday, 4, take the message around Genoa unbelief, to let the Atheists in the open, to show that they exist and have the right to speak, say the EU, the union degli atei, agnostici e razionalisti già promotrice delle campagne per lo sbattezzo con migliaia di adesioni. Una campagna "pubblicitaria", come già a Londra, a Washington, a Barcellona, dove da ieri girano due bus con la scritta «Probabilmente Dio non c´è. Adesso smettila di preoccuparti e goditi la vita».
La scelta degli atei italiani, invece, più che sull´edonismo, punta sulla serenità: puoi farcela anche da solo, senza guardare in alto. E non è un caso che la campagna parta da Genova, «la casa di Bagnasco, il capo dei vescovi italiani» sorride Raffaele Carcano, segretario generale dell´Uaar, la città scelta per il prossimo Gay Pride, già contestato by the Church to the contemporary with the Corpus Domini. Bagnasco is on a pilgrimage to Fatima, the only answer is to don Gianfranco Calabrese, director of catechesis in the Diocese of Genoa with no opposition.
things first. Atheism does not proselytize, but is not a religion but a state of mental freedom: the atheist or agnostic does not have the burden dell'indimostrabile to affect his life. Therefore, nothing led him to convince others of the goodness of his choice.
Unfortunately, the situation in Italy is such that cultural offensive atheist is almost necessary to shake the company from the residues of sectarianism that is to say overlook the real traces of secularism. So far all agree, the world atheist has the right to let people know of its existence, so that those who feel surrounded know that is not the only one who thinks a certain way. Well, okay to be seen, the galaxy anticlerical Italian needs courage.
But how to behave towards those who believe?
There are two ways: you go down to their level, or show what stuff it is made (or should be done). The fanatics of the EU have chosen the former path. Maybe because I've never been to a higher level. The message "God does not exist" is staggering idiocy. In summary, the juice is "Do not believe the unprovable dogma of church. Do you believe in ours. ".
not matter if we are not all convinced of the existence of God: it is clear that the existence of a superior being the creator and controller is a simple explanation that men have invented to explain what did not understand, but one thing will never be certified! This is about topics that go beyond the understanding of a man, and for the atheist to leave them alone to concentrate on his life. The message appeared in other countries read "God probably does not exist then stop worrying." It 's very, very different. First of all, did not presume to offer a mathematical certainty that instead atheists Italians have arrogated to themselves. Not looking good prig of a sermon. That "probably" put the slogan on top of any dogma, because it acknowledges the undeniable about our ignorance, which in itself means a show wisdom (Socrates or Confucius we bother to explain that to admit to not knowing is already a form of knowledge) that has no surfers in certainties. Wrong believers to consider the existence of god as a fact, because it amounts to not recognize his own ignorance, but also who the dogma is wrong simply adds a "not".
This is the point. The atheist does not offer false certainties. Atheism leads to seek it on their own, encourages people to improve themselves in a personal journey, does not pretend to teach.
brings us to the initiative of the AU itself, offering an analysis made clear, calm, cool and rational
E 'bullshit.
And now an explanation in more detail, although the definition just given is already complete in itself.
- criticize the church because it preaches to charity and then is covered with gold. And the atheists who do? They spend thousands of Euros for a slogan. So what do we criticize the church, if we have money in their hands when they do not spend more? This move eliminates one of the most important arrows in the quiver of an anti-clerical. A believer may well say "you are not migliori, guarda dove buttate i soldi".
- Si critica la chiesa per il suo dogmatismo, e si risponde con un altro dogma.
- Si attacca la chiesa e le si concede un'occasione per apparire una conciliante paladina della libertà di parola. Si passa per boia anzichè per vittime, si accende nella gente un istinto di simpatia verso la chiesa che viene provocata e risponde pacatamente.
- Non si parla di diritti civili, di scienza, di qualsiasi battaglia in atto contro il Vaticano. Non si usa la ragione come vessillo di battaglia, la stessa ragione di cui ci si dichiara depositari. Si parla semplicemente di una fede al contrario.
- Ateo significa senza dio. Quindi il messaggio dovrebbe riguardare tutto tranne dio. God did not consider in our equations, this is the heart of everything. And these idiots do they do? In the only space you have carved out talking about God. In doing so, however, show that we have to reckon with him, contradicting themselves and showing insecurity. Why a
But atheism originated as a response to a company that required it to believe it! And the problem was not "believe", but the 'required'. They did not just understand? They believe that we should simply impose not to believe? If you do, people will think more of a reflection. The lack of vision of these people is staggering, is a demonstration of ignorance about the history and social mechanisms.
Secularism means no religion outside the churches. No proselytizing then, something sacrosanct. Well, these idiots to promote it they start to proselytize in turn. Atheism is not a monster comes to get you and take you away, is a place where you come up with their legs and on his own initiative, whose mission is the preservation and improvement of its territory on which it is (the company). But that does not mean a company will improve simply if people no longer believe. There are those who need it, not everyone knows face life without persuasive evidence of a paradise, or whatever. And to deprive these people of faith is like denying a sufferer of his morphine. The atheist without belief but claim that the society they live in is not influenced by religion. The UAAR obviously not. Their mission is to stop believing the people clearly. This brings us to the level of their enemies, and make them a full-blown religion with chimera of reason instead of god. Needless to say, they say autolegittimatisi custodians of reason as much as the pope says autolegittimatosi representative of god. So what's the difference? Meet the new boss, same as the old boss dicevano gli Who. Quanto avevano ragione. Questa gente evidentemente è mossa esclusivamente dall'invidia per il potere che il Vaticano ha e loro no.
Ergo, qui mi professo ateo alla seconda potenza: non solo non condivido la religione cattolica, dio e tutto il resto, ma prendo le mie distanze anche dall'ateismo così come l'hanno ormai trasformato quei palloni gonfiati dell'UAAR. Chi mi ama mi segua.
Se non è stato sufficientemente chiaro: UAAR, non avete capito un cazzo.
0 comments:
Post a Comment